Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Four Seasons, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1984No. 82-1193PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari in order to determine whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel should be applied against the State of Alabama under the facts in this case. Those facts are set out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals;1 therefore, we do not repeat all of them here, but merely emphasize that on October 20, 1982, the tax assessor informed the petitioners that "the Board of Equalization has this date concluded its review of your protest. . . ." The statute controlling appeals from the board's ruling2 requires that appeals to the circuit court be taken within thirty days after the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Khalil Semaan v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. City of Montgomery v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. State v. Maddox Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Allen v. Johnny Baker Hauling, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte State Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. State Hwy. Dept. v. HEADRICK OUTDOOR ADV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Davis v. Alabama Medicaid AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Methodist Homes for the Aging v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API