Coons v. Carstensen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Can an owner of land encumbered by a restrictive agreement deliver good and clear record title if public law imposes substantially similar limitations upon the manner in which the land may be used?
By reason of St. 1961, c. 579, § 3, the Carstensens, who own 12.75 acres 2 bordering the Sudbury River in Lincoln, faced an uneasy choice. That statute authorized the Commissioner of Natural Resources to acquire approximately 1,000 acres of the marsh and land along the river as lay “at or below the [120-foot] contour interval above mean sea level,” unless the owner preempted the possible taking by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bull v. . BurtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Tramontozzi v. D'AMICISMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Morse v. StoberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Isaacs v. SchmuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Testa v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wolfe v. GormallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Board of Selectmen v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Citizens for Responsible Environmental Management v. Attleboro Mall, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Dicicco v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.