Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Zedlitz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1988No. 87-189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a jury verdict in favor of the appellees, Aaron and Opal Zedlitz, on their complaint against the appellant, Brian McWilliams, for willful and malicious misrepresentation (the tort of deceit) as to the need of a survey for the purchase of real property. It is claimed on appeal that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a directed verdict. In the alternative, it is argued that the verdict was against the preponderance of the evidence. Because there is substantial evidence to support the verdict, we affirm.

Sometime in October…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grendell v. KiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Storthz v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. KremerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Union Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. AlterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Wiseman v. BatchelorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Kellerman v. ZenoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Ripplemeyer v. National Grape Co-Op. Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API