Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Badke

New York County Courts

Decided September 5, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*472OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Randall Hinrichs, J.

Defendant has filed a motion seeking review by the court of the minutes of the grand jury proceeding which returned the instant indictment, and dismissal thereupon based upon legal insufficiency of the evidence. The People consent to have the court review the grand jury minutes for legal sufficiency and have provided a copy of the minutes to the court for that purpose. The People aver that the grand jury minutes are legally sufficient.

In arriving at the instant decision the court has received and considered the defendant’s motion with attached…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. HaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People v. LaddNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. Ricardo B.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starr v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. UrenaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API