Jackson v. Russell
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
C.W. Jackson brings this interlocutory appeal from the judgment of the Boone Cireuit Court granting George Russell leave to file an amended complaint to add a new party defendant after judgment had been entered. We reverse.
FACTS
Russell sued Jackson for tortious interference with a contract and recovered judgment against Jackson in the amount of $2,000,000 on September 24, 1984. On October 25, 1985, some thirteen months after the judgment was entered, Russell moved for leave to file a second amended complaint adding Jackson's wife, Marguerite, as a new party…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Philip Joseph Twohy, Jr. v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Robert Czeremcha v. International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States Labor Party v. John J. Oremus, Individually and in His Capacity as President of the Village of BridgeviewCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Biglan v. BiglanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Raymond v. WathenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hanover Logansport, Inc. v. Robert C. Anderson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sowers v. LaPorte Superior Court, No. IIIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hudson v. McClaskeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Leeper Electric Services, Inc. v. City of CarmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Casimir R Starsiak, Jr. v. Janette T StarsiakIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.