Legal Opinion

Hanover Logansport, Inc. v. Robert C. Anderson, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1987No. 71A03-8607-CV-00179PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Hanover (defendant below) appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss.

We reverse.

Hanover is the owner of certain business premises located in a K-Mart Shopping Center in South Bend. Anderson is a corporation which sought to operate a liquor store in that location. On February 23, 1984, Hanover and Anderson entered into a nine-year, eleven-month lease to begin on May 1, 1984. Hanover agreed to remove tenant Discount Liquors before that date. On July 18, 1984, Discount Liquors still occupied the space. Thus, Anderson filed the following complaint:

COMPLAINT FOR BREACH…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. McQueen v. Fayette County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bienz v. BloomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Barrington Management Co. v. Paul E. Draper Family Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Moore v. University of Notre DameDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. Leslie v. Hart (In Re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API