Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2002PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (PennDOT) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) sustaining Albert John Schneider’s (Schneider) appeal from PennDOT’s requirement that he install an ignition interlock device on all vehicles owned by him before his driving privilege could be restored.

The Ignition Interlock Device Act (Act) 1 was enacted in September 2000 and provides that a court must order repeat DUI offenders to install an ignition interlock device 2 on all vehicles they own…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mazza v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Mazza v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. McGrory v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Alexander v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Watterson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. McGrory v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API