Legal Opinion

McGrory v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2007PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This appeal presents the narrow issue of whether appellant, the Department of Transportation (PennDOT), had independent authority under the Ignition Interlock Law, 42 Pa.C.S. § 7003 (since repealed), to enforce the ignition interlock requirement on drivers convicted of a second or subsequent offense of driving under the influence (DUI) in instances where the trial court failed to impose the interlock requirement in its sentencing order.1 The Commonwealth Court panel below followed a series of decisions from that court, heretofore not reviewed by this Court, which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. MockaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Day v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Williams v. WynderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Whalen v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API