Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. United States

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 11, 1992No. ACMR MISC 9201338Published

1ConcurrenceArkow, Judge

I agree with the majority that petitioner is not entitled to relief by this Court.

*642The Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ] establishes a system of review for trials by courts-martial. Article 69, UCMJ, limits the review of cases in which review is not otherwise required by a Court of Military Review under Article 66, UCMJ.1 In such cases review is limited to an examination of the record of trial in the Office of the Judge Advocate General to determine whether “any part of the findings or sentence is found to be unsupported in law or if reassessment of the sentence is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. Unger v. ZiemniakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. SnyderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. BevilacquaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. Barnett v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API