Legal Opinion

Harvestall Industries, Inc. And Vincent B. Steffen v. Levi Hochstetler

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 1981No. 80-2646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Harvestall Industries and Vincent B. Steffen appeal from a ruling, upon motion for summary judgment, that found invalid Steffen’s patent for a grain elevator floor support. We affirm.

The focus of this controversy is a patent, owned by Steffen and licensed to Harve-stall, for a base and support of grain storage bins. 1 The design, by providing for wire-mesh type interlocking metal rods rather than solid concrete blocks as supporting columns, along with a perforated floor, permits the free flow of air throughout the grain bin in order to dry the grain or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Super Products Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. D P Way Corporation, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. A R Inc. v. Electro-Voice, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  3. Brunswick Corporation v. Champion Spark Plug CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Brookfield Athletic Shoe Co. v. Chicago Roller Skate Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Hycor Corp. v. Schlueter Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API