Harvestall Industries, Inc. And Vincent B. Steffen v. Levi Hochstetler
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Harvestall Industries and Vincent B. Steffen appeal from a ruling, upon motion for summary judgment, that found invalid Steffen’s patent for a grain elevator floor support. We affirm.
The focus of this controversy is a patent, owned by Steffen and licensed to Harve-stall, for a base and support of grain storage bins. 1 The design, by providing for wire-mesh type interlocking metal rods rather than solid concrete blocks as supporting columns, along with a perforated floor, permits the free flow of air throughout the grain bin in order to dry the grain or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Super Products Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. D P Way Corporation, a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- A R Inc. v. Electro-Voice, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schutt Manufacturing Co. v. Riddell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Marcyan v. Nissen Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
- Brunswick Corporation v. Champion Spark Plug CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Brookfield Athletic Shoe Co. v. Chicago Roller Skate Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Hycor Corp. v. Schlueter Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983