Brookfield Athletic Shoe Co. v. Chicago Roller Skate Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the motion of defendants Chicago Roller Skate Company (“Chicago”) and Red Stone Enterprise Company, Ltd., for summary judgment on the ground that (1) Chicago’s roller skate, Exhibit 17, does not infringe the design patent in suit, U.S. Patent Des. No. 261,542, owned by the plaintiff Brook-field Athletic Shoe Company, Inc.; (2) the patent in suit, No. 261,542, is invalid for the reasons enumerated in 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103 and 171; and (3) defendant is entitled to all of its costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees pursuant to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Loctite Corporation v. Fel-Pro, Inc. And Felt Products Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Peter M. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caddock v. Hy-Meg Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987