Legal Opinion
Davenport v. City of Tigard
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 16, 1993No. LUBA 92-104; CA A79179PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
The City of Tigard granted petitioners’ application for approval 1 of a 348-unit apartment development. Respondent 2 appealed the decision to LUBA, which remanded it to the city. Petitioners seek review, and we affirm.
We take the facts from LUBA’s opinion:
“A prior request for approval of an apartment development on the subject property was denied by the city in 1990, due to traffic safety concerns related to the condition of the streets and intersections serving the subject property. Thereafter, following study of alternatives for street system improvements, amendments to the Tigard…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Downtown Community Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilmour v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Holland v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Jones v. Willamette United Football ClubCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- East Lancaster Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996