Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1939No. Civ. 6126PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUTON, J., pro tern.
On April 18, 1938, the Superior Court of Stanislaus County granted its alternative writ of mandate commanding respondents to pay certain monies due on bond obligations of the Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, or to levy an assessment for such payment. The court also issued its temporary restraining order and order to show cause why respondents should not be enjoined from proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act of the United States. The respondents served and filed a motion to dissolve the restraining order and to dismiss the order to show cause; demand and notice of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Commission in Lunacy v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Goss v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Cecil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- McPheeters v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Liberal Catholic Church v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.