Legal Opinion
Marino v. Clary Lakes Homeowners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 16, 2015No. A14A2236PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
Clary Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. (the “Association”) sued homeowners Joseph and Patricia Marino, seeking damages and enforcement of a restrictive covenant that required garages to be used for parking vehicles and not for storage. The Marinos filed an answer and counterclaim, contending that the restrictive covenant was invalid. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the Association, but in Marino v. Clary Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc.1 (Marino I), we ruled that the restrictive covenant was unenforceable against the Marinos. Consequently, we reversed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc. v. Imaging Systems InternationalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Board of Commissioners v. City CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Holcim (US), Inc. v. AMDG, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Municipal Electric Authority v. Gold-Arrow Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- U.S. Home Corp. v. Michael Ballesteros TrustNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- SAWS AT SEVEN HILLS, LLC v. FORESTAR REALTY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Eagle Jets, LLC. v. Atlanta Jet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Ha&w Financial Advisors, LLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Pasha v. Battle Creek Homeowners Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.