Legal Opinion

McCall v. McCall Brothers Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1933No. Docket No. 9011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for a dissolution of copartnership, for an accounting and for the appointment of a receiver. Upon the filing of the verified complaint the trial court made an ex parte order appoint ing a receiver. Defendant Thaddeus D. McCall appeals from said order.

The sole contention made by appellant is that the trial court erred in making an ex parte order appointing a receiver as no showing was made that irreparable injury would result unless a receiver was so appointed. In our opinion this contention must be sustained. (A. G. Col Co. v. Superior Court, 196 Cal. 604 [238…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ryan v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Hobson v. Pacific States Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Tyler v. Park Ridge Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. ObergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API