Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Armentrout

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by L. D. Lambert against C. L. Arméntrout and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

C. L. Armentrout and C. S. Armentrout made a promissory note to R. E. Lee Armentrout, which R. E. Lee Armentrout assigned to L. D. Lambert, and Lambert sued on it before a justice making C. L. Armentrout, C. S. Armentrout and R. E. Lee Armentrout defendants. The case went to the circuit court of Randolph county by appeal, and there the court directed a *376verdict for the plaintiff, and from judgment against the three Armentrouts C. L. and C. S. Armentrout have come to this Court.

The defence was that the note had been given for a horse and wagon, and that the horse had been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. McCue v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Stout v. SandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Byrnside v. BurdettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KopaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Nash v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API