Legal Opinion

Stout v. Sands

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison Comity. Action by Elmore H. Stout against C. Sprigg Sands and' others. Decree for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

POFEENBARGER, PRESIDENT:

A bill and an amended bill to reform a deed, on the grounds of mistake and fraud having been dismissed by the circuit court of Harrison county, for want of proof of the allegations of the bill, the plaintiff has appealed

Some time in the year 1900 the plaintiff, Elmore H. Stout, being the owner of a tract of land, containing about two hundred acres, part of which is underlaid with the Pittsburgh vein of coal, and all of which is supposed to be underlaid with deeper veins of coal known by other names, executed, by the procure*664ment of one Samuel W. Kinsejy án option of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Union Trust Co. v. McClellanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Knight v. CapitoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Webb v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hefflebower v. DetrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. KopaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. William James Sons Co. v. HutchinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API