Burt v. Dodge
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
To obtain a writ of prohibition, a relator must show that the respondent has exercised judicial or quasi-judicial power, that the exercise of power was unauthorized by law, and that the relator has no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Collins v. O’Farrell (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 142, 143, 573 N.E.2d 113, 115.
Issuing an arrest warrant is of course an exercise of judicial power. However, the court of appeals dismissed this action because it concluded that, on the facts alleged in Burt’s complaint, Judge Dodge had power to issue the warrant. We agree with that conclusion and affirm.
A court may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Mancino v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- In re HelfrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Advantage Bank v. Waldo Pub., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000
- State v. Chavez-JuarezOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.