Legal Opinion
State v. Chavez-Juarez
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 2009No. 2009-CA-33PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Martin Chavez-Juarez, appeals from an order overruling his motion for contempt, which he filed against unnamed officers of the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (“ICE”).
{¶ 2} Chavez-Juarez (“Chavez”) contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for contempt, because the ICE agents deprived him of due process of law, equal protection of the law, and his right, under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, to a public hearing by intentionally interfering with his right to appear personally in his traffic…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nyquist v. MaucletSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chavez v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- ITS Fin., L.L.C. v. GebreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Contempt of AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re Contempt of LearyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chavez v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.