Crayton v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The parties are designated appellants and appellee.
The suit is one in trespass to try title and for partition of certain lands and arose out of the following facts: After the marriage of Mack and Lizzie Crayton they acquired by separate purchases five contiguous tracts of land in Milam county, aggregating 368 acres. They had seven children, Eelix, H. J., S. M., Jerry, and William Crayton, sons, and two daughters who are now Ada Bailey and Jennie Bradford. By a deed, dated October 10, 1890, Mack Crayton conveyed to his son, Eelix, a designated 40 acres out of the 368 acres. By separate deeds,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davis v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Salado College v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Askey v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. Pfeuffer & IrelandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Zarate v. VillarealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crayton v. PhillipsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Walker v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Williams v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1978
- Daniel v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Huddleston v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.