Legal Opinion

Crayton v. Phillips

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1928No. Nos. 911-4983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

The case is thus stated by Justice Blair of the Court of Civil Appeals:

“The suit is one in trespass to try title and for partition of certain lands and arose out of the following facts: After the marriage of Mach and Lizzie Crayton they acquired by separate purchases five contiguous tracts of land in Mi-lam county, aggregating 368 acres. They had seven children, Eelix, H. J., S. M., Jerry, and William Crayton, sons, and two daughters who are now Ada Bailey and Jennie Bradford. By a deed, dated October 10, 1890, Mach Crayton conveyed to his son, Éelix, a designated 40 acres out of the 368…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Moore v. SnowballTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ayres v. DupreyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Crayton v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Graham's Estate v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Henry v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. TownsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Huddleston v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Banctexas Wstheimer v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API