Legal Opinion

Lange v. City of Batesville

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 2005No. 05-60371UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiffs-Appellants the Langes and the Whitakers (collectively “the Whitakers”) sued Defendant-Appellee the City of Batesville, Mississippi (“the City”), asserting (1) claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of (a) the substantive and procedural components of the Due Process Clause, 1 and (b) the Takings Clause 2 ; and (2) pendent state law claims. The district court granted summary judgment to the City, holding that under the doctrines of issue preclusion and Rooker /Feldman, the final judgment of the Mississippi Court of Appeals in Lange v. City of Batesville 3 (/‘Lange…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. San Remo Hotel, L. P. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Petrina Thompson v. Dallas City Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Alpert v. RileyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Waller Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API