Legal Opinion

Thomas v. New York City Board of Elections

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 2012No. 12 Civ. 4223(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs are five voters who seek a mandatory injunction ordering the New *596York City Board of Elections (“Board”) to add Mark Escoffery-Bey to the ballot as a candidate for Congress in the upcoming June 26, 2012 Democratic primary election. Because, on the evidence submitted to this Court, plaintiffs cannot establish a likelihood of success on the merits, their motion is denied.

I. FACTS

The relevant facts appear to be undisputed.1 On April 16, 2012, a petition was filed with the Board to designate Escoffery-Bey as a candidate for Congress.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiraco v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  2. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993
  3. Hernandez v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Murray v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Yang v. New York State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API