Legal Opinion

In Re Amber B.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 11, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Candice N. appeals from the judgments entered by the District Court (Bangor, Cox, J.) on January 10, 1991, terminating her parental rights to her minor children, Amber B. and Bruce G., under 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055 (Pamph.1990). 1 We agree with Candice N.’s contention that the District Court erred in failing to make specific findings of fact as required by M.R.Civ.P. 52(a) and vacate the judgments.

A three-day consolidated hearing was held before the District Court on the petitions for the termination of Candice N.’s parental rights to Amber B., who is now 6 years old, and Bruce…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Amanda D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Jazmine L.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. In Re David G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Schwartz v. Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. In Re Heather G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. In Re Kenneth H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API