Legal Opinion

In Re Jazmine L.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 1, 2004PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] The father of Jazmine L., Jordan L., Michael L., and Nathaniel L. appeals from a judgment of the District Court (South Paris, Lawrence, J.) terminating his parental rights. He asserts that, as a matter of law, the findings supporting determination of his parental unfitness are insufficient to support the termination of his parental rights by the clear and convincing evidence required pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(1)(B)(2)(b) (2004). We agree and vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The four children first entered preliminary protective custody in August 2001, when the youngest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Rideout v. RiendeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. In Re Scott S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. In Re Charles G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. In Re Alana S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re Thomas H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. In re I.S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. In Re Hannah S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. In Re Johnna M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API