Legal Opinion
Hi-Ball Transit Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided June 19, 1928No. 3199-457PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
This suit was instituted early in March, 1928, by the plaintiff, a copartnership, composed of two gentlemen alleged to reside in the state of California. The bill is rather generally drawn, but alleges, in substance, that the eopartnersMp is operating a line of motor busses for the carriage of passengers, interstate, from California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to a terminus at Dallas, Tex., and from Dallas on into Oklahoma, Missouri, and ultimately to CMcagO'; that the railroad commission of Texas, wMeh is given power by an act of the Legislature to grant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Clark v. PoorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. MaloySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woolen v. Surtran Taxicabs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
- Woolf v. Del Rio Motor Transp. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Medigen of Kentucky, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of West VirginiaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1991
- Sage v. BaldwinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1932
- Southern Pacific Transport Co. of Texas v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.