Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Fairforest Finishing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 1942No. 15352PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Bonham.

The respondent in the above-entitled case suffered a physical injury on April 29, 1938, while in the employ of the appellant employer. He applied to the Industrial Commission for compensation, and was paid benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 39 St. at Large, p. 1231, for temporary total disability until July 25, 1938; he was then paid twenty-seven and one-half weeks’ compensation for specific functional injury to certain fingers until about February 10, 1939. Fie executed a final settlement receipt, reciting the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Fulghum v. BleakleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Fuller v. S. C. Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Ward v. Ocean Forest Club, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. McDonald v. Palmetto TheatersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. Walsh v. U. S. Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Crawford v. Town of WinnsboroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Clark v. Aiken County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Green v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API