Legal Opinion

Clement v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 23, 1991No. 90-0064-BPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court for factfinding and final resolution of claims by Plaintiff Kathleen Barker Clement under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., arising out of the medical care and treatment provided by Defendant United States of America to Plaintiff’s deceased brother, Burton Barker. Plaintiff’s claims were tried before the Court without a jury on March 13 and 14, 1991.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

Burton Barker was struck in the lower back by a log while working at a sawmill in 1977. He sustained ruptures of the third and fourth intervertebral discs.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wing v. MorseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. Downer v. VeilleuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Cox v. Dela CruzSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kathleen Barker Clement, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Burton Robert Barker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Bailey v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Bouchard v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  4. Dubois v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  5. Gray v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API