Legal Opinion
State v. Hicks
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2008No. 08-KA-402PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREG G. GUIDRY, Judge.
| ¿The Defendant, Arthur Hicks, appeals from his conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of La.R.S. 14:95.1. We affirm and remand for corrective action.
The Defendant was charged by a bill of information with the offense on February 1, 2006. He subsequently pled not guilty, and filed pre-trial motions to suppress the evidence and statements. The trial judge denied the motions, and on March 17, 2007, he waived his right to a jury trial. Following the bench trial on March 21 and 22, 2007, the Defendant was found guilty as charged. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. KellerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- State v. CoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. RocheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. GrantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.