Legal Opinion
Tenamee v. Schmukler
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 2006No. 05 CIV.7661PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Reuvan Tenamee (“Ten-amee”) commenced this action, naming as defendants Martin L. Schmukler individually and the Law Firm of Martin L. Schmukler, P.C. (collectively “Schmuk-ler”), Ruthi Tenamee, a/k/a/ Ruthi R. Nass (“Nass”) and Nava Tenamee a/k/a Nava Izak (“Izak”). His complaint contains allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation and legal malpractice, as well as civil claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961.
Schmukler 1 moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that:…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kevin Smith v. Michael McGinnis Superintendent, Southport Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Picard Ex Rel. Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC v. Madoff (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Gross v. WaywellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- United States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Buchwald v. Renco Group, Inc. (In Re Magnesium Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- RUSO v. MorrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.