People v. Lamey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The judgments followed upon convictions of the several crimes charged in counts I, IV and V of the information. Count II was dismissed and a new trial was granted of the charges contained in count III. On arraignment the defendant had pleaded, on each count, “not guilty” and “not guilty by reason of insanity.” With respect" to the pleas of “not guilty,” the evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the verdicts.
Appellant contends that the court erred in compelling him to become a witness during his trial on the plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. Over objections duly made, he was required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Application of TahbelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. GarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re MerwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.