Legal Opinion

People v. Bradshaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1935No. Crim. No 1831PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was charged by information with the commission of a felony, to wit, that, being a prisoner lawfully committed to the state prison at San Quentin for a term less than life, he escaped therefrom. Upon arraignment he entered a plea of not guilty, and also a plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity”. He subsequently withdrew the first of these pleas and was tried upon the latter before a jury, which returned a verdict that he was sane on the date of the commission of the offense with which he was charged. He was thereupon sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. GilbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BusbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. BalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API