People v. Bradshaw
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant was charged by information with the commission of a felony, to wit, that, being a prisoner lawfully committed to the state prison at San Quentin for a term less than life, he escaped therefrom. Upon arraignment he entered a plea of not guilty, and also a plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity”. He subsequently withdrew the first of these pleas and was tried upon the latter before a jury, which returned a verdict that he was sane on the date of the commission of the offense with which he was charged. He was thereupon sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. TrocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. GilbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BusbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. BalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976