Legal Opinion

Mantor v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1987No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Edward Mantor contends that Special Term erred in holding that the notice of occurrence given by plaintiff to the insurer was untimely. We disagree. Unlike the notice of occurrence provisions common to liability policies authorized by Insurance Law § 3420, the notice provisions in the present *999case dealing with no-fault benefits are governed by Insurance Law § 5101 et seq, and the rules and regulations enacted to implement the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Act. Under 11 NYCRR 65.12 notice of occurrence by an eligible person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CNA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re the Arbitration between Kauffman & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Persaud v. RahmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Mantor v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API