Legal Opinion

People v. Beckett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed and defendant’s application for reassignment of counsel denied. Memorandum: None of the contentions raised by assigned counsel and defendant pro se requires reversal and only a few require comment. Defendant’s statements were not taken in violation of his right to counsel. That right did not attach when a parole violation warrant was issued for defendant’s arrest since defendant had no right to counsel in the parole proceeding until his final revocation hearing (see, People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 NY2d 23, 31; People v Simons, 22 NY2d 533, 536-539, cert…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. BrenemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API