People v. Beckett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed and defendant’s application for reassignment of counsel denied. Memorandum: None of the contentions raised by assigned counsel and defendant pro se requires reversal and only a few require comment. Defendant’s statements were not taken in violation of his right to counsel. That right did not attach when a parole violation warrant was issued for defendant’s arrest since defendant had no right to counsel in the parole proceeding until his final revocation hearing (see, People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 NY2d 23, 31; People v Simons, 22 NY2d 533, 536-539, cert…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BrenemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993