Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13

The majority distorts the parties’ contract, apparently in order to achieve what it believes to be the better result. Because that result is not one for which the parties bargained and because the majority applies the wrong standard of review, I dissent.

We stated the issue in the first review in this case, OSEA v. Rainier School Dist. 13, 91 Or App 42, 44-45, 754 P2d 9 (1988):

“Petitioner alleged numerous violations of ORS 243.672 in its complaint to ERB. The only allegation which it continues to assert here is that the firing violated Article VII.D of the collective bargaining agreement. See…