Lees v. Oster
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from an injunction preventing defendant from practicing dentistry under the statute. 1 Affirmed. No costs awarded.
Defendant, unlicensed as a dentist, advertised that he would perform, and did perform all types of repair work on pros-thetics, including their manufacture as substitutes for natural teeth. He dealt directly with the public, not under any authority of a licensed dentist responsible therefor.
Though defendant claimed he did not take impressions himself, leaving this chore to the customer, and that he merely performed mechanical work on inert matter, we think…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Chicago Dental Society v. A.A.A. Dental Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Berry v. SummersIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Thrasher v. Board of GovernorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Stone v. Department of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. KogulSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.