Friedman v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge:

Nearly a year after the Court granted defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s jury demand, 1 plaintiff has moved “to affirm the plaintiff’s right to proceed to trial on the basis of the Court’s diversity jurisdiction and [to affirm her] right to trial by jury.” See Notice of Motion at 1. This motion is in essence an attempt to reargue the Court’s prior decision on the same grounds previously advanced. However, plaintiff’s papers add nothing to what was argued previously and they set forth no basis for a motion to reargue, even assuming that…