Curcuru v. Rose's Oil Service, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
The sole issue presented in these appeals is whether a plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial on a claim brought in the Superior Court seeking recovery under the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA), 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 761 et seq. (2000). The trial judge submitted the plaintiffs’ DOHSA claims to the jury on an advisory basis; after the jury answered special questions in favor of the plaintiffs, the judge decided that there was no right to a jury trial and entered judgment based on her own findings in favor of the defendant. For the following reasons, we conclude that there is a right to a jury…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Curcuru v. Rose's Oil Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- PowerShare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Curcuru v. Rose's Oil Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- In re: Lion Air Flight JT 610 CrashDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.