Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Grays Harbor County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1956No. 33486PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is an action to recover a yield tax of $3,387.63, due under the reforestation act, paid under protest by the Albie Logging Company. Judgment of dismissal was entered after trial to the court and this appeal follows.

The reforestation act was enacted as chapter 40, Laws of 1931, p. 117. (We do not cite RCW 84.28 because it was apparently an attempt to rewrite the act.) The act was dis cussed in State ex rel. Mason County Logging Company v. Wiley, 177 Wash. 65, 31 P. (2d) 539; and State v. Dexter, 32 Wn. (2d) 551, 202 P. (2d) 906,13 A. L. R. (2d) 1081. The purpose of the act is to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DexterWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Swanson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Nearhoff v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Mason County Logging Co. v. WileyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. City of Tacoma v. Fletcher Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brazier Forest Products, Inc. v. Northern Transport, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sullins v. SullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kinne v. KinneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Department of Social & Health Services v. OlverWashington Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API