Legal Opinion

People v. Hurley

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1957No. Crim. 3306PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Convicted of first degree robbery, defendant claims insufficiency of the evidence and errors of law during the trial.(1) Is the evidence identifying defendant as a participant sufficient? Yes.

The robbery took place in a tavern between 9 and 10 in the evening. It was perpetrated by one Murphy * who took the leading part, issuing the orders and wielding a gun, assisted by a person who picked up the money and was identified as defendant Hurley by two eyewitnesses, Maloney the bartender and Gately, one of the guests.

Coneededly, defendant and Murphy had been friends for a good…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. ColeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. McKayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. People v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API