Kuts-Cheraux v. Wilson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
The basic question here is the right of licensed naturopaths to prescribe and to use drugs for compensation in the practice of their healing art. A subsidiary question involves the constitutionality of section 67-1107, A.C.A.1939, prior to its amendment, Laws 1949, ch. 42, sec. 7, which sets forth the penal provisions for one practicing medicine without a license issued by the state 'board of medical examiners.
A statement of the background .of the litigation .will- aid in understanding the problems presented. The, state medical board was complaining to various law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- McCall v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Swank v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- State v. BehringerArizona Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. FerraroArizona Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Fendler v. Texaco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Chalupa v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Smith v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1953