Legal Opinion
Swank v. Patterson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1943No. 10443PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
In the District Court of the United States for the District of Arizona, appellant, W. S. Swank, brought an action against appellees, J. H. Patterson, E. J. Gotthelf, Charles S. Smith, Charles C. Bradbury and William G. Schultz, for damages in the sum of $100,-000. Within the time prescribed for answering, appellees, by their attorney, Cecil A. Edwards, applied for and obtained an extension of such time. Within such extended time, Patterson, Gotthelf, Smith and Bradbury moved to dismiss the action. Appellant moved to set aside the order extending the time for answering,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Betty B. Burgess, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of S. Reed Burgess, Jr., Deceased v. Charlottesville Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Floyd T. Stanturf v. Donald SipesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Chambers Development Co. v. Browning-Ferris IndustriesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- People v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.