Keplinger v. Boyett
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
Mrs. Boyett, plaintiff below, instituted suit against Mr. and Mrs. Keplinger, husband and wife, defendants below, to recover the sum due on a promissory note executed by the husband alone. From a judgment in favor of Mrs. Boyett in the amount of the note together with interest thereon, against them jointly and severally, the Keplingers have appealed.
Appellee’s counsel, in his answering brief, has urged this court to dismiss the appéal on the grounds of the inadequacy of appellants’ opening brief. Although it is difficult to ascertain the legal issues sought to be presented to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Donato v. FishburnArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Fox v. WeissbachArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Ellsworth v. EllsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Bainum v. RoundyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Wine v. WineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Lederman v. Phelps Dodge CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Kreiss v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.