Lederman v. Phelps Dodge Corporation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellant Lederman was one of several defendants in a suit by Phelps Dodge to recover damages, compensatory and punitive, allegedly resulting from a conspiracy to defraud Phelps,.Dodge. The case was tried to the court; sitting without a jury, extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered, and Phelps Dodge prevailed, recovering both compensatory and punitive damages. Only Lederman has appealed.
He presents six questions for review, five of which include bald assertions of deprivation of constitutional guarantees. 1
At the outset, we are constrained to point out…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Baker v. LeightArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Phoenix v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Hall v. Bannock CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Mercantile National Life Insurance Co. v. VillalbaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Washington Nationall Corp. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Coronado Development Corp. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Coronado Development Corp. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.