Legal Opinion

Bainum v. Roundy

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 23, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2137PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal arises from a suit upon a promissory note executed and delivered in the State of Utah by appellant-husband as a result of a transaction entered into by him and appellee for the sale of stock. The case was tried to the court sitting without a jury and it was ordered that appellee have judgment “against the defendant Marvin L. Bainum and Nadine Bainum, his wife”. Appellants contend that the action was barred by the statute of limitations unless, as apparently the trial court found, a letter written by appellant-husband on March 25, 1969, constitutes a sufficient…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greener v. GreenerUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Donato v. FishburnArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Pacific States Cut Stone Co. v. GobleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Freeman v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Keplinger v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Godbey v. ROOSEVELT SCH. DIST. NO. 66, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Lorenz-Auxier Financial Group, Inc. v. BidewellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Valley National Bank of Arizona v. LeSueur (In Re LeSueur)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1985
  4. Vikse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Vikse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API