Whitt v. Erb Lumber
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant ERB Lumber appeals from an order compelling discovery entered by the Clark County Court of Common Pleas. ERB contends that following the trial court’s order would place it in the position of disclosing privileged information and that the order, therefore, constitutes an abuse of discretion.
{¶ 2} We conclude that the discovery compelled by the trial court’s order may be construed broadly enough to include the dissemination of possibly privileged information. Accordingly, the order of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lightbody v. RustOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Pollitt v. Mobay Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Patterson v. Zdanski, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. Painters Supply & Equip. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Gzk, Inc. v. Schumaker Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Dubson v. Montefiore HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Novak v. CaminoOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio RegionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.