Legal Opinion

Norman v. Waite

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1890PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appear from the district court for Hamilton county. Heard below before'Norval, J. cited: Bank v. Luckow, 35 N. W. Rep., 434; Whiting v. Steer, 16 Pae. Rep. [Cal.], 134; Thudium v.Yost, 11 Atl. Rep. [Pa.], 436 ; Wolff v. Mathews, 12 S. W. Rep. '[Mo.], 211; Coiiingwood v. Merchants Banh, 15 Neb., 121; Howard v. Stratton, 64 Cal., 487; Dor ring ton v. Minnick, 15 Neb., 403; Austin v. Pickier, 4 S. E. Rep., 35 ; Michels v. Olmstead, 14 Fed.

Read the full summary

Appear from the district court for Hamilton county. Heard below before'Norval, J. cited: Bank v. Luckow, 35 N. W. Rep., 434; Whiting v. Steer, 16 Pae. Rep. [Cal.], 134; Thudium v.Yost, 11 Atl. Rep. [Pa.], 436 ; Wolff v. Mathews, 12 S. W. Rep. '[Mo.], 211; Coiiingwood v. Merchants Banh, 15 Neb., 121; Howard v. Stratton, 64 Cal., 487; Dor ring ton v. Minnick, 15 Neb., 403; Austin v. Pickier, 4 S. E. Rep., 35 ; Michels v. Olmstead, 14 Fed. Rep., 219; Skaaraas v. Finnegan, 16 N. W. Rep.,''456; Westeman v. Krumweide, 15 Id., 255; Cull-mans v. Lindsay, 6 Atl. Rep., 332; Callender v. Drabelle, 35 N.…

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ci-i. J. .

This action was brought in the Hamilton county district court by E. R. Norman, plaintiff, against Daniel M. Waite, Mira A. Woods, and Austin J. Rittenhouse, defendants, for the purpose of foreclosing a mortgage of real property made by said Mira A. Woods for the security of two promissory notes executed and delivered by the said Daniel M. Waite and Mira A. Woods to said Austin J. Rittenhouse; and by him indorsed to the plaintiff. The petition is in the usual form, with the allegation that the said notes were, before the same became due by the indorsement of the said defendant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Howard v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cullmans v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Dorrington v. MinnickNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Thudium v. YostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barnett v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McLachlan v. Incorporated Town of GraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Davis v. SternsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API