Legal Opinion

Batt v. Vittum

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court allowing the will of A. Marion Merrill, late of Concord, deceased. The appellant is described in the petition for probate as an heir-at-law and next of kin of the deceased.

The will as executed consists — in addition to formal recitals — of four separate numbered paragraphs. By each of paragraphs numbered I and II a pecuniary legacy was given to an educational institution. Paragraph numbered III was a residuary clause providing that “All the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate, of whatever nature or sort, and wherever the same may be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wellman v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Sanderson v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Bigelow v. GillottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Worcester Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Southworth v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dauray v. MeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  2. Schneider v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Swan v. SwanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  4. Yont v. EadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. First National Bank v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API