Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Norcross

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1922PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a petition for the proof and allowance of a will. The pertinent facts are that Otis L. Norcross, an intelligent business man, in October, 1913, duly executed the will here offered for probate. Thereafter it remained exclusively in his possession until his death in April, 1919. It then was found in his safe as left there by him, with the signature scratched out, with lines drawn through the names of the witnesses and through two bequeathing paragraphs in the body of the instrument, and with these words written on the margin in the handwriting of the testator: “This will is void as I…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Pickens v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Polsey v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Stuart v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Linkins v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Williams v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Stone v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Worcester Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API