Macartor v. Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
The parties in this case are neighboring landowners contesting their respective rights tó a supply of what the parties agree is percolating underground water. Defendant has moved to dismiss the first three causes of action. Plaintiffs have countered with a demand for summary judgment in the first cause of action.
In their first cause of action plaintiffs allege that they are the owners and inhabitants of a residential dwelling located near a suburban area known .as Graylyn Crest III. Plaintiffs in the past have supplied their household water needs from a well on their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rose v. Socony-Vacuum Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
- Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
- Pecos County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Little v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacArtor v. The Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
- MacArtor v. Graylyn Crest III Swim Club, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1961